I filed an FOIA a while back and just re-relocated where I put the paper copy (too bad I did not receive an electronic copy).
|05||08/04 – 05/05||$43650|
|06||07/05 – 05/06||$58775|
|07||07/06 – 05/07||$50575|
|08||07/07 – 06/08||$89975|
|09||07/08 – 06/09||$161875|
|10||07/04 – 03/10||$95600|
Ok, so first a disclaimer: personally, I see the value in having a 3rd-party, objective consultant administrate the school assignment lotteries; you pay someone to arbitrarily stick kids in school according to some algorithm and it is hard to call foul play or favoritism for specific individuals.
Having said that, I am quite concerned about the significant increase in payments. I cannot account for the $40,000 increase in 08 – the information shows the only thing unusual was an increase in the number of “CONSULTANT FEES” (from 10 in 07 to 14 in 08). There is no explanation why the average Fee charged to Unit 4 was increased slightly, nor the special $8000 “SERVICE” at the beginning of 08. More worrisome is how this set a trend and nearly doubled the amounts paid out in 09, totally 20 times that the district was assessed a fee, not to mention a whopping $22625 charge in May 09. 2010 is looking to be another good year for EnrolledU, at our expense. I am not sure why. What services are we receiving that warrant these charges?
Makes me wonder if I can be a consultant for Unit 4. 🙂