More about Standardized Tests

The StudentsFirst blog features an article about Michael Loeb lauding the advantages of a good Standardized Test. I am not going to spend much time talking about that particular blog post; it is an interesting read that gives a fairly balanced, if personal, account from one teacher’s perspective. However, I do want to focus a little more on one of the main subjects of the article, Common Core State Standards (CCSS).


CCSS at least makes for a good sell; the site is attractive enough, got some flashy things going on, talks in generalized, “who wouldn’t want this” kind of air. The “Key Points” sound great, like this quote from the Mathematics page:

The standards stress not only procedural skill but also conceptual understanding, to make sure students are learning and absorbing the critical information they need to succeed at higher levels – rather than the current practices by which many students learn enough to get by on the next test, but forget it shortly thereafter, only to review again the following year.


So where does the rubber meet the road? How exactly are they going to do this through “standards”?


What raised the red flag for me was from the FAQ (you do read those, right? *grin*):

Q. Why is the Common Core State Standards Initiative important?

A. We want to make sure that every child across the country is given the tools they need to succeed. High standards that are consistent across states provide teachers, parents, and students with a set of clear expectations that everyone can work toward together. This will ensure that we maintain America’s competitive edge, so that all of our students are well prepared with the skills and knowledge necessary to compete with not only their peers here at home, but with students from around the world.

[emphasis mine]


The first part of that Answer is dead on, I love it! Give people high, clearly-defined expectations and get ready to be amazed. But then the author(s) completely threw away any good sentiment with that last sentence. Instead of going through every word of that statement and ripping it apart, let me summarize by saying that I am utterly saddened that our leaders want us (and our children) to focus on beating everyone else, being the top dog, the Big Kahuna. Why?!? Not only am I not convinced that the price is worth it, I am rather convinced that the price is not worth it. Why would we want to turn our society into mathematic wizards?


At the risk of beating a dead horse, I personally would want to see us focus on life skills that allow people (not merely individuals, but individuals who function in a way that benefits the whole) to flourish in society as a part of society. So now we have Johnny TwoShoes who can bring home 6-digit bacon but doesn’t have a clue why the poor get poorer, nor could he care less. All he cares about is getting what he “deserves” and taking care of his own.


Is that really what you want?

3 Responses to “More about Standardized Tests”

  1. charlesdschultz Says:

    I am also curious why “English Language” is coupled with “Art”. I must confess, I have heard the term “Language Arts” for a long long time, but I have no idea what that couplet is supposed to mean. It is not a well communicated thought, not a well established concept.

    Truly, to master English is an Art in and of itself.

  2. unassigned Says:

    Hi Charles. I guess I read a lot less into that statement than you did. While beating the world is not necessarily high on my list, you really do need to aim high so that those who can become math wizards will be able to do so; those who can’t will get better marks when high expectations are set, and that’s not really a bad thing. Cooperation and compassion are also important, but not necessarily the main focus of math class.

    Being skeptical about methods and whether they can meet their goals is another thing entirely, and I am also curious!


  3. The Purpose of Education: Part 1 « A citizen’s blog about Champaign Unit 4 Says:

    […] that nowhere above did I say we should not have standardized tests (and yes, I still hate them *grin*). I did not say that we should do away with STEM (no love lost there, […]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: