Plan B

I submitted a guest commentary to the NG (Dan Corkery), which I will include below. I limited it to 749 words (before editing), but there is more I wish to include. In fact, I will probably remember more and more things to include. 🙂

 

First and foremost, I want to make it clear that I am not trying to hurl stones at the Unit 4 administration nor the Board. I believe they have a ton of good intentions, and obviously this whole saga is not an easy one. I must also remind us all that the current board and administration inherited this problem from their predecessors. Having said that, I hope that anyone reading “between the lines” realizes that I disagree with the board and the administration about the current direction of the $150 million referendum, but I by no means want to disparage them. Likewise, there will be those that disagree with me, and I will not take that personally. This is a huge deal we are talking about – not just building a new high school, but what our schools will look like in the next 80 years or so.

 

I also wish to remind all of us that there is still a ton of work that needs to be done in other schools. Dr. Howard? There is significant attention being poured upon where to site a high school, but for almost a decade now we have heard hints of outstanding, deferred maintenance. We cannot simply ignore that. It is utterly irresponsible for the school district to not maintain the buildings it owns. To this I would also say that there is a huge communication problem in that the school district has not properly educated the pubic; the school district has attempted to raise property taxes to fix buildings, but the public frequently rejects the proposition at vote time. Why?

 

I also mention building smaller schools, and I suggest starting with Judah. Maybe we keep Judah “as is”, maybe we renovate later. There is still an option at Spalding, maybe in the next few years, to do something. I am certain there are many other options around town. I wish to tie into Greg Novak’s, Marc Changnon and the findings of Dejong-Richter – a small highschool focused on the trades would receive a lot of support. In fact, this was one of the top-voted options in the Dejong-Richter findings, something you will not find in the FAQ. I am not proposing that we reduce the current highschools from 1200 students down to 900 (which is an interesting idea), but rather that we cap each high school at 1150 students or so, and build smaller schools to handle future capacity. I submit that smaller schools are much more versatile and adaptive to future needs. You could even have a single high school at several locations (other Illinois schools are doing this already). Finally, in talking to another resident in town, why do we compare to larger schools – why not compare to Urbana? Just saying.

 

Lastly, in last sentence of my guest commentary, I broach the topic of allowing park districts to maintain the athletic facilities. I understand this is contentious and I have not devoted any time or space to developing this idea. In my opinion, the school district should be focused on public education. Sports have become a huge portion of secondary and post-secondary education. Why? As much as I am against it, I realize there are a large number of citizens, voters and supporters that love the marriage of athletic programs and education, and I will not be able to change their mind over night. That’s ok, for now. We will just have to disagree. My point is, in the context of Plan B, if we allow for a small school that has very little requirement for practice fields, it is quite easy to find “in-fill” space in town for such a school. I am in total agreement with those that argue our kids need extra-curricular (what does that mean? *grin*) and intra-curricular athletics for our students – it is REALLY good for them to be active in many different ways. I am not saying students should not be in athletics. If you read that somehow, please go back and read again.

 

Here is the Guest Commentary I have submitted.

guest_commentary_Plan_B

Advertisements

7 Responses to “Plan B”

  1. kshannon617 Says:

    Nice article. I’m glad you submitted this, because I think a lot of people are leery of voting yes on the referendum, but don’t know what other choice we have.

  2. kshannon617 Says:

    Speaking of Plan B’s (or would that be Plans B?), I ran across an interesting blog post. My mother-in-law’s brother is chair of the school board in St. Cloud, Minnesota, and they are dealing with (somewhat) similar issues. He recently posted this, which contains links to several relevant articles about renovation vs. rebuilding, etc. So it may be interesting reading material.

    http://jvonkorff.blogspot.com/2014_08_01_archive.html

  3. charlesdschultz Says:

    Thanks for sharing those, Kshannon – good stuff, and I hope others will read the blog post you linked.

    As I am reading through the tweets about tonight’s BOE meeting, I hear a lot of positivity and excitement about the new high schools. Just in passing, I find it interesting that the one route towards more square feet per student is to increase the size of the space. Instead of decreasing the number of students that fill the space. Additionally, there are a number of comments that make me wonder, why do we have to have a new building in order to accomplish many of these goals? It is a very “build it and they will come” kind of twitter feed at the moment.

    I do note a couple of comments that are wise. For one, yes, this is an investment on our future one way or another, I have no doubt about that. I also note the comment about exciting and giving teachers positive incentive – that is a good thing. 🙂

  4. Kathy R. Says:

    Thanks for this. I too am torn between wanting to appreciate all the good efforts from Unit 4 people- board, teachers, administrators – and still respectfully disagreeing with the current referendum. Kathy Shannon and I (Kathy Richards) both attended the meeting tonight. Both of us were interviewed on local news. We’ll see if we ruffled any feathers…

  5. kshannon617 Says:

    I think I’m scared to watch. I hope I managed to be somewhat coherent!

  6. Communications with Unit 4 | Citizen4: A citizen's blog about Champaign Unit 4 Says:

    […] got me to thinking that I need to expand on my Plan B a bit more. In two different […]


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: