Over the weekend, I posted a series of questions about the Feb 25th BOE meeting (tonight). Dr. Wiegand was kind enough to respond (and with comprehensive answers at that) and has given me permission to post her reply. The following has only been formatted so it looks better on this blog (a la “the following movie has been formatted to fit your screen”).
|For Paul Fallon: how many of the 216 people who responded favorably to 19A make up the 170 people who said they were less likely to vote for it in question 19B? Similar question for question 20A and 20B.|
|(from Paul Fallon) Judy, I will have to get that data file from my office, so I will try to send it to you tomorrow or Wednesday. Thanks, Paul|
|How long as the Teacher Evaluation Committee been in place?|
|The Committee was established at the end of last school year to address the need for a teacher evaluation system that would meet the requirements of PERA (Performance Evaluation Reform Act). The committee began working this school year during first semester to collaboratively develop an evaluation document and process. In previous years this was not done in a collaborative manner. The Administration would develop a document and then present to the CFT for feedback. This is the first time a process was used that had both Administration and Teachers at the same starting point.|
|Where are the meeting minutes?|
|The work done during each session was documented by Pam Rosa from CEC. Committee members were then charged with sharing this with the groups they represent to obtain feedback. Since this work was ongoing and part of an internal committee, minutes were not posted publicly.|
|Does the board agree with premises put forth by the Consortium for Educational Change? Read the rest of this entry »|